FCOM vs. FDIS
FCOM (Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCOM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCOM returned 11.60%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for FDIS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
FCOM vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 11.60%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
FCOM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 11.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
FCOM vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | -3.17% | 26.06% | 33.05% | 44.65% | -38.97% | 13.88% | 28.33% | 26.69% | -5.33% | 8.20% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and FDIS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FCOM and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCOM vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCOM
FDIS
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
FCOM
FDIS
Technology
FCOM
FDIS
Consumer Cyclical
FCOM
FDIS
Real Estate
FCOM
FDIS
Basic Materials
FCOM
-
FDIS
-
Consumer Defensive
FCOM
-
FDIS
Energy
FCOM
-
FDIS
-
Financial Services
FCOM
-
FDIS
Healthcare
FCOM
-
FDIS
Industrials
FCOM
-
FDIS
Utilities
FCOM
-
FDIS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOM vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
FCOM
FDIS
FCOM vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCOM | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.72 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 2.24 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOM | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.76% | -39.16% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -15.50% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -27.43% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.76% | -39.16% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.76% | -39.16% | -7.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -4.58% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -7.49% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 5.01% | -1.33% |
Volatility
FCOM vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOM | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 6.19% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 13.44% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 18.52% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 23.92% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 22.32% | -1.36% |
FCOM vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FCOM and FDIS have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FCOM vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 11.70% | 2.27% | 2.92% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOM and FDIS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 11.60% for FCOM. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCOM and FDIS have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
FCOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index.
FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOM and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer