PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCOM vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCOM vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 11.60%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


FCOM

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
11.60%

FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCOM vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
-3.17%26.06%33.05%44.65%-38.97%13.88%28.33%26.69%-5.33%8.20%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FCOM and FDIS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.72

The correlation between FCOM and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCOM vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCOM
FDIS

Communication Services

98.5%
0.2%

Technology

1.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
96.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

FCOM
98.5%
FDIS
0.2%

Technology

FCOM
1.2%
FDIS
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FCOM
0.3%
FDIS
96.9%

Real Estate

FCOM
0.1%
FDIS
0.1%

Basic Materials

FCOM

-

FDIS

-

Consumer Defensive

FCOM

-

FDIS
1.0%

Energy

FCOM

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

FCOM

-

FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

FCOM

-

FDIS
0.1%

Industrials

FCOM

-

FDIS
0.8%

Utilities

FCOM

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCOM vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCOM
FCOM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCOM vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCOMFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.72

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

2.24

+1.81

FCOM vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCOM and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCOM vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCOMFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-39.16%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-15.50%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-27.43%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.76%

-39.16%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.76%

-39.16%

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-4.58%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-7.49%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

5.01%

-1.33%

Volatility

FCOM vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is 4.08%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that FCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCOMFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

6.19%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

13.44%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

18.52%

-3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

23.92%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

22.32%

-1.36%

FCOM vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCOM and FDIS have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCOM vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
0.96%0.88%0.87%0.77%1.04%0.90%0.68%0.86%2.78%11.70%2.27%2.92%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCOM and FDIS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FCOM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOM dropped -46.76% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 11.60% for FCOM. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FCOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCOM and FDIS have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

FCOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FCOM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. FCOM tracks MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index.

FCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCOM and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer