EET vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
EET and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EET is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both EET and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EET vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EET vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 4.32% | 63.14% | 2.88% | 7.06% | -43.07% | -10.93% | 18.92% | 31.87% | -33.84% | 82.41% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 6.49%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.40% annualized return.
EET
- 1D
- 7.49%
- 1M
- -18.78%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 59.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- -2.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.49%
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EET vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EET and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
EET vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
EET
QLD
EET vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EET | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.84 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.43 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.49 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 4.88 | +3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EET | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.84 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.34 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.66 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.53 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between EET and QLD is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EET vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | 1.81% | 1.82% | 3.85% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
EET vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EET | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.66% | -83.13% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.38% | -25.13% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.98% | -63.68% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -63.68% | -5.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -20.10% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.58% | -18.30% | -19.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.08% | 7.67% | -0.59% |
Volatility
EET vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 12.96%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EET | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.60% | 12.96% | +8.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.38% | 25.55% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.28% | 44.91% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 44.77% | -7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 44.47% | -4.20% |