PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 36.10%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.49% annualized return.


QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and SPY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.89

The correlation between QLD and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
SPY

Technology

53.8%
35.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.4%

Industrials

2.8%
7.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

QLD
53.8%
SPY
35.9%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
SPY
4.8%

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
SPY
8.4%

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
SPY
7.8%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
SPY
2.4%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
SPY
1.8%

Energy

QLD
0.6%
SPY
3.6%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
SPY
11.8%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.16

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

14.72

-2.80

QLD vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.38

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.87

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Drawdowns

QLD vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-55.19%

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-8.88%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-18.76%

-23.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-24.50%

-39.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-33.72%

-29.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.70%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-9.05%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

1.91%

+5.29%

Volatility

QLD vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

2.84%

+6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

8.90%

+15.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

11.83%

+20.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.74%

17.05%

+27.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.56%

17.94%

+26.62%

QLD vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QLD and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 15.49% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.09% for SPY.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer