PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 34.57%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


QLD

1D
-9.57%
1M
1.92%
YTD
27.20%
6M
22.35%
1Y
67.86%
3Y*
44.68%
5Y*
23.00%
10Y*
34.57%

TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
103.91%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
27.20%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and TQQQ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

1.00

The correlation between QLD and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
TQQQ

Technology

53.8%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

2.8%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QLD
53.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
TQQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
TQQQ
2.8%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
TQQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

QLD
0.6%
TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
TQQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.83

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

9.20

+0.21

QLD vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.10

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.65

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Drawdowns

QLD vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-81.66%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-36.97%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-58.04%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-81.66%

+17.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-81.66%

+17.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.93%

-16.25%

+5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-18.52%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

11.33%

-4.10%

Volatility

QLD vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 13.48%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

20.42%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.19%

39.33%

-13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.33%

49.81%

-16.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.91%

66.79%

-21.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.66%

66.11%

-21.45%

QLD vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QLD and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

QLD vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QLD and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to QLD (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 34.57% for QLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 13.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 34.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLD and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer