QLD vs. TQQQ
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 34.57%/yr vs 42.84%/yr for TQQQ. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QLD vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 34.57%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- -9.57%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 27.20%
- 6M
- 22.35%
- 1Y
- 67.86%
- 3Y*
- 44.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.00%
- 10Y*
- 34.57%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -14.28%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 38.79%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 103.91%
- 3Y*
- 60.11%
- 5Y*
- 24.09%
- 10Y*
- 42.84%
QLD vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 27.20% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 38.79% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and TQQQ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 1.00 |
The correlation between QLD and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLD vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLD
TQQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QLD
TQQQ
Communication Services
QLD
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QLD
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
QLD
TQQQ
Healthcare
QLD
TQQQ
Industrials
QLD
TQQQ
Utilities
QLD
TQQQ
Basic Materials
QLD
TQQQ
Energy
QLD
TQQQ
Financial Services
QLD
TQQQ
Real Estate
QLD
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
TQQQ
QLD vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.83 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 9.20 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.10 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.36 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.65 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.71 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -81.66% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -36.97% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -58.04% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -81.66% | +17.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -81.66% | +17.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -16.25% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -18.52% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 11.33% | -4.10% |
Volatility
QLD vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 13.48%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 20.42% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.19% | 39.33% | -13.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.33% | 49.81% | -16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.91% | 66.79% | -21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.66% | 66.11% | -21.45% |
QLD vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QLD and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QLD vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.43% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QLD and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to QLD (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 34.57% for QLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 13.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 34.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLD and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer