PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 33.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 12.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 7.68%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.


EET

1D
4.46%
1M
-0.45%
6M
13.44%
YTD
33.40%
1Y
67.86%
3Y*
29.94%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
4.37%

SPEM

1D
1.74%
1M
1.76%
6M
6.10%
YTD
12.25%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.50%
ALL TIME*
5.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$566.01K$1.38M$1.55M
$95.25M$107.80M$120.67M

EET vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
33.40%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.25%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and SPEM is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009

0.96

The correlation between EET and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
SPEM

Financial Services

57.7%
19.9%

Basic Materials

-

7.7%

Communication Services

-

6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Energy

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

32.7%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Financial Services

EET
57.7%
SPEM
19.9%

Basic Materials

EET

-

SPEM
7.7%

Communication Services

EET

-

SPEM
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

SPEM
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

SPEM
3.7%

Energy

EET

-

SPEM
3.8%

Healthcare

EET

-

SPEM
3.9%

Industrials

EET

-

SPEM
8.3%

Real Estate

EET

-

SPEM
1.8%

Technology

EET

-

SPEM
32.7%

Utilities

EET

-

SPEM
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EET vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.09

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

6.89

+0.30

EET vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than SPEM's maximum drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-64.41%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.43%

-11.36%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-17.62%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.36%

-30.03%

-31.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-36.06%

-33.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.22%

-2.09%

-14.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-14.65%

-22.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

3.44%

+6.04%

Volatility

EET vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 18.60% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 5.73%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.60%

5.73%

+12.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

15.37%

+29.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.33%

17.77%

+31.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.82%

17.38%

+22.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.32%

18.81%

+22.51%

EET vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than SPEM's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.50%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.50%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EET and SPEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EET has higher volatility (18.60%) compared to SPEM (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 8.50% vs 7.68% for EET. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.50% for EET.

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.07% for SPEM.

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer