QLD vs. SSO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO).
QLD and SSO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both QLD and SSO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QLD or SSO.
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and SSO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QLD vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QLD:
-0.15
SSO:
-0.06
QLD:
0.12
SSO:
0.18
QLD:
1.02
SSO:
1.03
QLD:
-0.18
SSO:
-0.07
QLD:
-0.58
SSO:
-0.26
QLD:
13.09%
SSO:
8.69%
QLD:
49.54%
SSO:
38.01%
QLD:
-83.13%
SSO:
-84.67%
QLD:
-38.54%
SSO:
-31.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a -31.76% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's -25.88% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed SSO with an annualized return of 22.82%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.60% annualized return.
QLD
-31.76%
-21.06%
-28.47%
-2.46%
22.46%
22.82%
SSO
-25.88%
-18.94%
-25.97%
-0.10%
22.19%
15.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLD vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QLD vs. SSO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QLD
SSO
QLD vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QLD vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than SSO's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.33% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.11% | 0.19% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P 500 | 1.13% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SSO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QLD vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 31.59% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) at 27.08%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.