QLD vs. VOO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 32.61%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

QLD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 23.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 32.61%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.

QLD

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: -4.40%
• 6M: 19.20%
• YTD: 23.13%
• 1Y: 47.19%
• 3Y*: 39.28%
• 5Y*: 17.91%
• 10Y*: 32.61%
• ALL TIME*: 24.88%

VOO

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 9.53%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 15.17%
• ALL TIME*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	$415.38M	$389.55M	$441.01M
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.97B	$3.80B	$5.49B

QLD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	23.13%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	11.72%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and VOO is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.90

The correlation between QLD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLD	VOO
Technology	60.9%	38.6%
Communication Services	13.1%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	4.5%
Healthcare	3.6%	8.9%
Industrials	2.7%	8.5%
Utilities	1.1%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.5%	3.0%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QLD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 48
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 48

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLD	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.83	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.53	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	2.63	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	11.23	-5.68

QLD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-33.99%	-49.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-8.90%	-16.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	-18.69%	-23.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	-24.52%	-39.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	-33.99%	-29.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.78%	0.00%	-13.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.10%	-3.67%	-14.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.51%	2.08%	+6.43%

Volatility

QLD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLD	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.87%	3.81%	+10.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.06%	10.18%	+21.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.59%	12.80%	+25.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.80%	16.95%	+28.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.00%	18.02%	+26.98%

QLD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, QLD and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLD or VOO?

QLD has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, QLD or VOO?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 32.61% vs 15.17% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLD or VOO?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 32.61% return vs 15.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLD or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLD or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between QLD and VOO?

QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.