PortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and VOO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

QLD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5,115.50%
576.04%
QLD
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QLD:

0.36

VOO:

0.75

Sortino Ratio

QLD:

0.84

VOO:

1.15

Omega Ratio

QLD:

1.12

VOO:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

QLD:

0.43

VOO:

0.77

Martin Ratio

QLD:

1.29

VOO:

3.04

Ulcer Index

QLD:

14.11%

VOO:

4.72%

Daily Std Dev

QLD:

50.00%

VOO:

19.15%

Max Drawdown

QLD:

-83.13%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

QLD:

-22.15%

VOO:

-7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a -13.56% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 26.65%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.58% annualized return.


QLD

YTD

-13.56%

1M

14.35%

6M

-6.06%

1Y

12.53%

5Y*

27.48%

10Y*

26.65%

VOO

YTD

-3.02%

1M

5.37%

6M

-0.14%

1Y

12.28%

5Y*

16.67%

10Y*

12.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for QLD: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QLD: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value is 0.03%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VOO: 0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QLD vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLD is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLD is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLD is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLD is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLD is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLD is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QLD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QLD, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QLD: 0.36
VOO: 0.75
The chart of Sortino ratio for QLD, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QLD: 0.84
VOO: 1.15
The chart of Omega ratio for QLD, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QLD: 1.12
VOO: 1.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for QLD, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QLD: 0.43
VOO: 0.77
The chart of Martin ratio for QLD, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QLD: 1.29
VOO: 3.04

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.36
0.75
QLD
VOO

Dividends

QLD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than VOO's 1.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.26%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.90%0.11%0.19%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.34%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

QLD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-22.15%
-7.30%
QLD
VOO

Volatility

QLD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 32.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 13.90%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
32.45%
13.90%
QLD
VOO