XTN vs. MOTO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XTN (SPDR S&P Transportation ETF) and MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) are both Transportation Equities funds. XTN is passively managed, while MOTO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTN returned 6.44%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for MOTO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOTO.

Performance

XTN vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 24.64% return, which is significantly higher than MOTO's 21.35% return.

XTN

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 24.64%
• 6M: 22.47%
• 1Y: 45.99%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

MOTO

• 1D: -5.00%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: 21.35%
• 6M: 20.71%
• 1Y: 43.37%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTN vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	24.64%	6.33%	4.86%	25.22%	-28.10%	33.68%	12.11%	0.00%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	21.35%	27.38%	2.01%	27.10%	-27.20%	17.22%	59.13%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and MOTO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019	0.70

The correlation between XTN and MOTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTN vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTN	MOTO
Industrials	95.7%	18.7%
Technology	4.3%	45.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.6%
Communication Services	-	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	26.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

XTN vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTN

XTN Risk / Return Rank: 50
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 62
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTN vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTN	MOTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.89	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.46	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	3.26	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	11.11	-3.75

XTN vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTN vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and MOTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTN	MOTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-38.24%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.28%	-13.36%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.69%	-26.43%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-37.34%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.37%	-7.73%	+4.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.91%	-9.93%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.26%	3.91%	+2.35%

Volatility

XTN vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) is 7.65%, while SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that XTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTN	MOTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.65%	11.45%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.64%	19.16%	+3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.35%	23.09%	+5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.94%	23.99%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.21%	26.47%	-0.26%

XTN vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTN vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than MOTO's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.87%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	0.65%	0.78%	0.93%	0.73%	1.04%	1.02%	0.75%	1.17%	0.98%	0.63%	0.66%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTN and MOTO in my portfolio?

XTN and MOTO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTN or MOTO?

MOTO has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to XTN (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

Which ETF is better, XTN or MOTO?

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 8.94% vs 6.44% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTN or MOTO?

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 8.94% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTN or MOTO?

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTN or MOTO?

MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.65% for XTN.

What is the main difference between XTN and MOTO?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.68% for MOTO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.