PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTO vs. IDRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTO vs. IDRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 31.35% return, which is significantly higher than IDRV's 19.91% return.


MOTO

1D
2.46%
1M
6.90%
YTD
31.35%
6M
32.65%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*

IDRV

1D
0.84%
1M
4.49%
YTD
19.91%
6M
21.18%
1Y
55.29%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTO vs. IDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
31.35%27.38%2.01%27.10%-27.20%17.22%59.13%4.91%
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
19.91%32.24%-16.05%7.83%-36.37%26.99%59.46%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and IDRV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.87

The correlation between MOTO and IDRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTO vs. IDRV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTO
IDRV

Technology

45.6%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

23.5%
55.0%

Industrials

12.8%
24.8%

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

MOTO
45.6%
IDRV
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTO
23.5%
IDRV
55.0%

Industrials

MOTO
12.8%
IDRV
24.8%

Communication Services

MOTO
4.4%
IDRV

-

Basic Materials

MOTO
3.8%
IDRV
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

MOTO
2.3%
IDRV

-

Financial Services

MOTO
1.0%
IDRV

-

Utilities

MOTO
0.7%
IDRV

-

Energy

MOTO

-

IDRV

-

Healthcare

MOTO

-

IDRV

-

Real Estate

MOTO

-

IDRV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTO vs. IDRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IDRV
IDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTO vs. IDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTOIDRVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

2.25

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

2.86

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

4.31

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.00

14.32

+1.68

MOTO vs. IDRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the IDRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and IDRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTOIDRVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.25

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.02

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.36

+0.36

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. IDRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum IDRV drawdown of -53.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and IDRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTOIDRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-53.00%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-12.62%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

-44.00%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

-53.00%

+15.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.77%

+11.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-22.38%

+12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.80%

-0.07%

Volatility

MOTO vs. IDRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is 7.77%, while iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that MOTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTOIDRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

9.13%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

18.72%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.18%

24.70%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

27.69%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.30%

28.09%

-1.79%

MOTO vs. IDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IDRV's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTO vs. IDRV - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IDRV's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IDRV
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
1.42%1.70%2.68%2.17%2.29%1.12%0.69%1.29%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.80%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTO and IDRV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDRV has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to MOTO (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs IDRV's -53.00%.

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 10.81% vs 0.50% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 0.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.80% for MOTO.

MOTO is categorized as Transportation Equities, while IDRV is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.48% for IDRV.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTO and IDRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer