MOTO vs. IDRV
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and IDRV (iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTO is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while IDRV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index. MOTO is actively managed, while IDRV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 10.81%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDRV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IDRV.
Performance
MOTO vs. IDRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 31.35% return, which is significantly higher than IDRV's 19.91% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 31.35%
- 6M
- 32.65%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
IDRV
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 6M
- 21.18%
- 1Y
- 55.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- —
MOTO vs. IDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 31.35% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 59.13% | 4.91% |
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 19.91% | 32.24% | -16.05% | 7.83% | -36.37% | 26.99% | 59.46% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and IDRV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MOTO and IDRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTO vs. IDRV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTO
IDRV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MOTO
IDRV
Consumer Cyclical
MOTO
IDRV
Industrials
MOTO
IDRV
Communication Services
MOTO
IDRV
-
Basic Materials
MOTO
IDRV
Consumer Defensive
MOTO
IDRV
-
Financial Services
MOTO
IDRV
-
Utilities
MOTO
IDRV
-
Energy
MOTO
-
IDRV
-
Healthcare
MOTO
-
IDRV
-
Real Estate
MOTO
-
IDRV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. IDRV — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
IDRV
MOTO vs. IDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOTO | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 2.25 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | 2.86 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.37 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 4.31 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.00 | 14.32 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTO | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.25 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.02 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.36 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. IDRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum IDRV drawdown of -53.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and IDRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -53.00% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.36% | -12.62% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -44.00% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -53.00% | +15.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.77% | +11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -22.38% | +12.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.80% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. IDRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is 7.77%, while iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that MOTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 9.13% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 18.72% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.18% | 24.70% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 27.69% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 28.09% | -1.79% |
MOTO vs. IDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IDRV's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. IDRV - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IDRV's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 2.68% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 1.12% | 0.69% | 1.29% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.80% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and IDRV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDRV has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to MOTO (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs IDRV's -53.00%.
On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 10.81% vs 0.50% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 0.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.80% for MOTO.
MOTO is categorized as Transportation Equities, while IDRV is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.48% for IDRV.
MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and IDRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer