PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTN vs. CARZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTN vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 24.64% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 45.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XTN has underperformed CARZ with an annualized return of 11.36%, while CARZ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.27% annualized return.


XTN

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.93%
YTD
24.64%
6M
22.47%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*
11.36%

CARZ

1D
-6.26%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
45.91%
6M
45.04%
1Y
96.22%
3Y*
30.25%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
16.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTN vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
24.64%6.33%4.86%25.22%-28.10%33.68%12.11%21.85%-17.26%21.55%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
45.91%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and CARZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011

0.59

The correlation between XTN and CARZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTN vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTN
CARZ

Industrials

95.7%
7.5%

Technology

4.3%
34.6%

Basic Materials

-

6.5%

Communication Services

-

1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

21.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XTN
95.7%
CARZ
7.5%

Technology

XTN
4.3%
CARZ
34.6%

Basic Materials

XTN

-

CARZ
6.5%

Communication Services

XTN

-

CARZ
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XTN

-

CARZ
21.5%

Consumer Defensive

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Energy

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Financial Services

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Healthcare

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Real Estate

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Utilities

XTN

-

CARZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTN vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTN
XTN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTN vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTNCARZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.53

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

6.70

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

24.83

-17.47

XTN vs. CARZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the CARZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and CARZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTN vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum CARZ drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and CARZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTNCARZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-51.20%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-14.44%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-27.84%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-40.30%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-51.20%

+7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-7.71%

+4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-12.87%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

3.89%

+2.37%

Volatility

XTN vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) is 7.65%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 16.09%. This indicates that XTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTNCARZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

16.09%

-8.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.64%

24.90%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.35%

29.42%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.94%

28.81%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.21%

26.54%

-0.33%

XTN vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTN vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than CARZ's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.46%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
0.65%0.78%0.93%0.73%1.04%1.02%0.75%1.17%0.98%0.63%0.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTN and CARZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (16.09%) compared to XTN (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs CARZ's -51.20%.

On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 16.27% vs 11.36% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.65% for XTN.

XTN is categorized as Transportation Equities, while CARZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTN and CARZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer