PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MOTO vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MOTOLIT
YTD Return1.86%-12.92%
1Y Return14.58%-9.35%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.84%-21.51%
Sharpe Ratio0.85-0.22
Sortino Ratio1.25-0.10
Omega Ratio1.160.99
Calmar Ratio0.72-0.11
Martin Ratio3.02-0.39
Ulcer Index5.60%17.93%
Daily Std Dev19.91%32.04%
Max Drawdown-38.24%-62.61%
Current Drawdown-11.04%-52.93%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between MOTO and LIT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MOTO vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -12.92% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.85%
-4.26%
MOTO
LIT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOTO vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for MOTO: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MOTO vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MOTO, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MOTO, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MOTO, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MOTO, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MOTO, currently valued at 3.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.02
LIT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LIT, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.500.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.39

MOTO vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.85
-0.22
MOTO
LIT

Dividends

MOTO vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than LIT's 1.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
2.68%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.38%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%0.32%

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.04%
-52.93%
MOTO
LIT

Volatility

MOTO vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is 4.76%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that MOTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.76%
10.88%
MOTO
LIT