MOTO vs. LIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while LIT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. MOTO is actively managed, while LIT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 7.72%/yr vs -2.82%/yr for LIT. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

MOTO vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 7.18% return.

MOTO

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: 8.05%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.10%

LIT

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -9.55%
• 6M: -0.62%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 1Y: 70.85%
• 3Y*: 2.87%
• 5Y*: -2.82%
• 10Y*: 12.66%
• ALL TIME*: 6.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	$15.35M	$16.35M	$33.70M
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	$14.87K	$16.20K	$15.49K

MOTO vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	15.61%	27.38%	2.01%	27.10%	-27.20%	17.22%	59.13%	5.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	7.18%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and LIT is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019	0.68

The correlation between MOTO and LIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTO vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTO	LIT
Technology	43.0%	20.0%
Consumer Cyclical	23.7%	9.2%
Industrials	15.3%	22.9%
Communication Services	4.4%	-
Basic Materials	3.8%	47.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	-
Financial Services	1.0%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

MOTO vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 50
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 78
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTO vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTO	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.05	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.61	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	2.62	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.77	8.37	-2.61

MOTO vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTO	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-65.91%	+27.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.07%	-26.84%	+10.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	-49.14%	+22.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	-65.91%	+28.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.09%	-25.06%	+12.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-33.48%	+23.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	8.40%	-3.15%

Volatility

MOTO vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is 8.51%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that MOTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTO	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.51%	9.34%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.84%	25.15%	-4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.57%	34.47%	-9.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.24%	31.93%	-7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.51%	30.80%	-4.29%

MOTO vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTO vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than LIT's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.73%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.91%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTO and LIT in my portfolio?

MOTO and LIT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTO or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to MOTO (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which ETF is better, MOTO or LIT?

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 7.72% vs -2.82% for LIT. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTO or LIT?

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 7.72% return vs -2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTO or LIT?

MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTO or LIT?

MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.73% for LIT.

What is the main difference between MOTO and LIT?

MOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while LIT is Lithium & Battery Metals. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.75% for LIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.