PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTO vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTO vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 5.04% return.


MOTO

1D
-5.00%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
21.35%
6M
20.71%
1Y
43.37%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*

KARS

1D
-4.28%
1M
-9.61%
YTD
5.04%
6M
4.08%
1Y
49.48%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-4.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTO vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
21.35%27.38%2.01%27.10%-27.20%17.22%59.13%5.00%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
5.04%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and KARS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.76

The correlation between MOTO and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTO vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTO
KARS

Technology

45.1%
19.0%

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
33.5%

Industrials

18.7%
22.1%

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%
25.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Financial Services

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

MOTO
45.1%
KARS
19.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTO
26.4%
KARS
33.5%

Industrials

MOTO
18.7%
KARS
22.1%

Communication Services

MOTO
4.1%
KARS

-

Basic Materials

MOTO
3.6%
KARS
25.4%

Consumer Defensive

MOTO
2.1%
KARS

-

Financial Services

MOTO
1.0%
KARS

-

Utilities

MOTO
0.7%
KARS

-

Energy

MOTO

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

MOTO

-

KARS

-

Real Estate

MOTO

-

KARS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTO vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTO vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTOKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.17

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

10.99

+0.12

MOTO vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTOKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-64.85%

+26.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-15.68%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

-47.79%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

-64.85%

+27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.73%

-35.97%

+28.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-28.34%

+18.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.51%

-0.60%

Volatility

MOTO vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) have volatilities of 11.45% and 11.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTOKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.45%

11.59%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

21.33%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.09%

27.82%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

30.09%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

29.41%

-2.94%

MOTO vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTO vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than KARS's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.87%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTO and KARS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to MOTO (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 8.94% vs -4.78% for KARS. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 11.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 8.94% return vs -4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.17% for KARS.

MOTO is categorized as Transportation Equities, while KARS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.72% for KARS.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTO and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer