XTN vs. IYT
XTN (SPDR S&P Transportation ETF) and IYT (iShares Transportation Average ETF) are both Transportation Equities funds - XTN tracks the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index while IYT tracks the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTN returned 11.40%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for IYT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYT.
Performance
XTN vs. IYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 25.03% return, which is significantly higher than IYT's 14.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XTN having a 11.40% annualized return and IYT not far behind at 11.22%.
XTN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 25.03%
- 6M
- 21.61%
- 1Y
- 49.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
IYT
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
XTN vs. IYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 25.03% | 6.33% | 4.86% | 25.22% | -28.10% | 33.68% | 12.11% | 21.85% | -17.26% | 21.55% |
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 14.16% | 11.48% | 4.10% | 24.62% | -21.74% | 26.41% | 14.20% | 20.11% | -12.87% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTN and IYT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XTN and IYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTN vs. IYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTN
IYT
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XTN
IYT
Technology
XTN
IYT
Basic Materials
XTN
-
IYT
-
Communication Services
XTN
-
IYT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XTN
-
IYT
-
Consumer Defensive
XTN
-
IYT
-
Energy
XTN
-
IYT
-
Financial Services
XTN
-
IYT
-
Healthcare
XTN
-
IYT
-
Real Estate
XTN
-
IYT
-
Utilities
XTN
-
IYT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTN vs. IYT — Risk / Return Rank
XTN
IYT
XTN vs. IYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTN | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.61 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 8.46 | -0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTN vs. IYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum IYT drawdown of -60.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and IYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTN | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.77% | -60.39% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -12.09% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.69% | -26.35% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -29.15% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.77% | -41.28% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -2.21% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.91% | -9.30% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 3.72% | +2.54% |
Volatility
XTN vs. IYT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) at 7.02%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTN | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 7.02% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.65% | 16.25% | +6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.40% | 20.72% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 22.40% | +4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 23.21% | +3.04% |
XTN vs. IYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYT's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTN vs. IYT - Dividend Comparison
XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IYT's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 1.28% |
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 0.77% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 0.63% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTN and IYT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTN has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to IYT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs IYT's -60.39%.
On 10-year performance, XTN leads with 11.40% vs 11.22% for IYT. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTN has performed better with a 11.40% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.
IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.77% for XTN.
XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.42% for IYT.
XTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTN and IYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer