XTN vs. PEJ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ).
XTN and PEJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. PEJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both XTN and PEJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XTN or PEJ.
Key characteristics
| XTN | PEJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.55% | 26.54% |
| 1Y Return | 34.57% | 41.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.80% | 1.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.55% | 4.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.11% | 5.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.56 | 2.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.32 | 3.22 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.22 | 1.34 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.65 | 14.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.16% | 2.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.33% | 17.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.77% | -66.03% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.89% | -1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTN and PEJ is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XTN vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than PEJ's 26.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XTN has outperformed PEJ with an annualized return of 7.11%, while PEJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTN vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XTN vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XTN vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than PEJ's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 0.64% | 0.66% | 1.03% | 0.39% | 0.42% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
XTN vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and PEJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XTN vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) at 5.22%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.