PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTN vs. IYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTN vs. IYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XTN having a 19.69% return and IYW slightly lower at 19.29%. Over the past 10 years, XTN has underperformed IYW with an annualized return of 10.20%, while IYW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


XTN

1D
-0.36%
1M
-5.96%
6M
13.81%
YTD
19.69%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.20%
ALL TIME*
10.72%

IYW

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.23%
6M
20.08%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
28.25%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
24.38%
ALL TIME*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$125.49M$126.55M$189.91M
$3.22M$3.69M$6.00M

XTN vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
19.69%6.33%4.86%25.22%-28.10%33.68%12.11%21.85%-17.26%21.55%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
19.29%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%36.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and IYW is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.56

The correlation between XTN and IYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTN vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTN
XTN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTN vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTNIYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.77

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

5.23

+0.08

XTN vs. IYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the IYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and IYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTN vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and IYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTNIYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-81.90%

+38.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-17.81%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-26.47%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-39.44%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-39.44%

-4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-8.40%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-34.48%

+23.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

6.03%

+0.15%

Volatility

XTN vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) is 5.56%, while iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that XTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTNIYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

7.86%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.33%

19.90%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

23.79%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

26.47%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

25.36%

+0.80%

XTN vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTN vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than IYW's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
0.67%0.78%0.93%0.73%1.04%1.02%0.75%1.17%0.98%0.63%0.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTN and IYW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYW has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to XTN (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs IYW's -81.90%.

On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 24.38% vs 10.20% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.

XTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.

XTN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IYW is Technology Equities. XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.38% for IYW.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTN and IYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer