WARP vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

WARP vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WARP

• 1D: -6.84%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARP vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WARP VanEck Space ETF	23.47%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WARP and FLTR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026	-0.11

Return for Risk

WARP vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARP vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WARP	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	22.26	0.53	+21.74

Drawdowns

WARP vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WARP	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.67%	-17.84%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.67%	-0.04%	-18.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-0.67%	-2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WARP	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.83%	0.79%	+83.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.83%	2.13%	+81.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.83%	5.00%	+78.83%

WARP vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

WARP vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
WARP VanEck Space ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WARP and FLTR in my portfolio?

WARP and FLTR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WARP or FLTR?

On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WARP or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WARP or FLTR?

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.

What is the main difference between WARP and FLTR?

WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.14% for FLTR.