PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WARP vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WARP vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WARP

1D
5.25%
1M
-20.94%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

UFO

1D
3.79%
1M
-10.30%
6M
2.22%
YTD
17.74%
1Y
54.84%
3Y*
34.13%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.10M$26.53M$70.91M
$702.73K$925.56K$3.69M

WARP vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
-24.31%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
-13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between WARP and UFO is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WARP vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WARP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WARP vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WARPUFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

WARP vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WARP vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than UFO's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARPUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.52%

-50.33%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.66%

-32.89%

-15.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-21.97%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.68%

Volatility

WARP vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARPUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.88%

41.96%

+34.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.88%

30.95%

+45.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.88%

31.26%

+45.62%

WARP vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WARP vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.33%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, WARP and UFO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.

WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UFO is Global Equities. WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.75% for UFO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WARP and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer