PortfoliosLab logo
FLTR vs. ENIAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLTR and ENIAX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLTR vs. ENIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLTR:

2.38

ENIAX:

2.38

Sortino Ratio

FLTR:

2.76

ENIAX:

2.69

Omega Ratio

FLTR:

2.02

ENIAX:

2.62

Calmar Ratio

FLTR:

0.14

ENIAX:

2.36

Martin Ratio

FLTR:

20.82

ENIAX:

10.05

Ulcer Index

FLTR:

0.27%

ENIAX:

0.52%

Daily Std Dev

FLTR:

2.34%

ENIAX:

2.17%

Max Drawdown

FLTR:

-56.97%

ENIAX:

-30.62%

Current Drawdown

FLTR:

-37.49%

ENIAX:

-0.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than ENIAX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has underperformed ENIAX with an annualized return of -4.20%, while ENIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.86% annualized return.


FLTR

YTD

1.48%

1M

0.78%

6M

2.34%

1Y

5.53%

5Y*

4.10%

10Y*

-4.20%

ENIAX

YTD

0.38%

1M

1.13%

6M

1.16%

1Y

5.12%

5Y*

5.27%

10Y*

3.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTR vs. ENIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ENIAX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTR vs. ENIAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTR is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTR is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTR is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTR is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTR is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ENIAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENIAX is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENIAX is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENIAX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENIAX is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENIAX is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENIAX is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLTR vs. ENIAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ENIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTR and ENIAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLTR vs. ENIAX - Dividend Comparison

FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than ENIAX's 6.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.51%5.93%6.07%2.29%0.63%1.49%3.05%2.67%0.84%0.58%0.35%0.33%
ENIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund
6.57%6.78%7.08%4.07%2.67%4.06%4.32%3.97%3.01%2.76%2.55%2.56%

Drawdowns

FLTR vs. ENIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, which is greater than ENIAX's maximum drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and ENIAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLTR vs. ENIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.30%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Opportunistic Income Fund (ENIAX) has a volatility of 0.39%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...