WARP vs. ROKT
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.
Performance
WARP vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROKT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 60.20%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and ROKT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
ROKT
WARP vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 0.86 | +21.40 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and ROKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -43.16% | +24.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -8.82% | -9.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -6.75% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 28.89% | +54.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 22.78% | +61.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 25.14% | +58.69% |
WARP vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, WARP and ROKT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.45% for ROKT.
Find the right allocation for WARP and ROKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer