PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WARP vs. ROKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WARP vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WARP

1D
-6.84%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROKT

1D
-3.71%
1M
12.62%
YTD
46.55%
6M
60.20%
1Y
111.37%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARP vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WARP and ROKT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WARP vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WARP

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARP vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WARP vs. ROKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARPROKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

22.26

0.86

+21.40

Drawdowns

WARP vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and ROKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARPROKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-43.16%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.67%

-8.82%

-9.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-6.75%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

Volatility

WARP vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARPROKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.83%

28.89%

+54.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.83%

22.78%

+61.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.83%

25.14%

+58.69%

WARP vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WARP vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison

WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.27%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, WARP and ROKT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.

ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.

WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.45% for ROKT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WARP and ROKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer