FLTR vs. ICSH
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH).
FLTR and ICSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. ICSH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Dec 11, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTR or ICSH.
Performance
FLTR vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 4.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 2.71%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
FLTR
6.60%
0.58%
3.07%
7.55%
3.40%
2.71%
ICSH
4.94%
0.31%
2.81%
5.76%
2.68%
2.43%
Key characteristics
| FLTR | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.44 | 13.41 |
| Sortino Ratio | 12.21 | 36.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.83 | 8.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.25 | 83.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 114.61 | 501.98 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.02% | 0.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.84% | -3.94% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.04% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTR vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and ICSH is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTR vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTR vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than ICSH's 5.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.10% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 5.27% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.22% | 2.60% | 2.19% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and ICSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTR vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) at 0.14%. This indicates that FLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.