WARP vs. NASA
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index, while NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema. WARP is passively managed, while NASA is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NASA.
Performance
WARP vs. NASA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -30.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- -25.85%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. NASA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -9.45% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and NASA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. NASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WARP vs. NASA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, which is greater than NASA's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and NASA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -31.39% | -7.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.58% | -31.39% | -7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -7.53% | -5.97% |
Volatility
WARP vs. NASA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.18% | 67.40% | +21.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.18% | 67.40% | +21.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.18% | 67.40% | +21.78% |
WARP vs. NASA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NASA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. NASA - Dividend Comparison
Neither WARP nor NASA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, WARP and NASA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
WARP and NASA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NASA is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.75% for NASA.
Find the right allocation for WARP and NASA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer