FLTR vs. FLOT
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT).
FLTR and FLOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. FLOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Jun 14, 2011. Both FLTR and FLOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTR or FLOT.
Performance
FLTR vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has outperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 2.72%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.
FLTR
6.56%
0.61%
3.11%
7.55%
3.39%
2.72%
FLOT
5.89%
0.60%
2.96%
6.67%
3.01%
2.35%
Key characteristics
| FLTR | FLOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.47 | 8.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 12.28 | 14.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.85 | 4.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.31 | 14.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 115.34 | 161.87 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.07% | 0.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.02% | 0.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.84% | -13.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.08% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTR vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and FLOT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTR vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTR vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than FLOT's 5.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.10% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 5.91% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.45% | 0.97% | 0.53% | 0.44% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and FLOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTR vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that FLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.