WARP vs. MARS
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index, while MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. WARP is passively managed, while MARS is actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MARS.
Performance
WARP vs. MARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS
- 1D
- -6.85%
- 1M
- 20.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. MARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 20.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and MARS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. MARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | MARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 6.31 | +15.96 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. MARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, roughly equal to the maximum MARS drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and MARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | MARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -19.50% | +0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -19.50% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -3.31% | +0.08% |
Volatility
WARP vs. MARS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | MARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 62.89% | +20.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 62.89% | +20.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 62.89% | +20.94% |
WARP vs. MARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MARS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. MARS - Dividend Comparison
Neither WARP nor MARS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, WARP and MARS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
WARP and MARS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MARS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.75% for MARS.
Find the right allocation for WARP and MARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer