PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WARP vs. MARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WARP vs. MARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WARP

1D
-6.84%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARS

1D
-6.85%
1M
20.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARP vs. MARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WARP and MARS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WARP vs. MARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WARP vs. MARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARPMARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

22.26

6.31

+15.96

Drawdowns

WARP vs. MARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, roughly equal to the maximum MARS drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and MARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARPMARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-19.50%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.67%

-19.50%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-3.31%

+0.08%

Volatility

WARP vs. MARS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARPMARSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.83%

62.89%

+20.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.83%

62.89%

+20.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.83%

62.89%

+20.94%

WARP vs. MARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MARS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WARP vs. MARS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WARP nor MARS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, WARP and MARS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.

WARP and MARS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MARS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.75% for MARS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WARP and MARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer