FLTR vs. SGOV
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV).
FLTR and SGOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. SGOV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 26, 2020. Both FLTR and SGOV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTR or SGOV.
Key characteristics
| FLTR | SGOV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.06% | 1.86% |
| 1Y Return | 8.32% | 5.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.70% | 2.85% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.78 | 22.36 |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.05% | 0.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.84% | -0.03% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and SGOV is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLTR vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTR vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTR vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTR vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than SGOV's 5.18% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.25% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 5.18% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and SGOV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTR vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that FLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.