WARP vs. TOLZ
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
WARP vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
WARP vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and TOLZ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
TOLZ
WARP vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 0.41 | +21.85 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -39.33% | +20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -3.13% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -6.63% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.71% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 10.29% | +73.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 13.99% | +69.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 16.29% | +67.54% |
WARP vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.46% for TOLZ.
Find the right allocation for WARP and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer