FLTR vs. JBBB
FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. FLTR is passively managed, while JBBB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLTR returned 6.12%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for JBBB. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for JBBB.
Performance
FLTR vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's 1.34% return.
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
JBBB
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.99% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.34% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and JBBB is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
JBBB
FLTR vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTR | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +10.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.16 | 1.31 | +1.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.09 | 1.99 | +15.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.01 | 6.77 | +95.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTR | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.82 | 1.45 | +5.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.28 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and JBBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -10.57% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -2.46% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -3.82% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -1.58% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.72% | -0.67% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.25%, while Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.70% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 2.80% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 3.38% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 5.26% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.26% | -0.26% |
FLTR vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLTR vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than JBBB's 7.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.16% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and JBBB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBBB has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs JBBB's -10.57%.
On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.33% vs 6.12% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.
JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 4.72% for FLTR.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JBBB is CLO. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.49% for JBBB.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.82 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and JBBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer