VYM vs. NOBL
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Dividend funds - VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index while NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.85%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
VYM vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 11.85%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
VYM vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.85% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and NOBL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VYM and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VYM vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
NOBL
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VYM
NOBL
Technology
VYM
NOBL
Healthcare
VYM
NOBL
Industrials
VYM
NOBL
Energy
VYM
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
VYM
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
NOBL
Utilities
VYM
NOBL
Communication Services
VYM
NOBL
-
Basic Materials
VYM
NOBL
Real Estate
VYM
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
NOBL
VYM vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 1.37 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 3.50 | +10.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -35.43% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -9.11% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -15.36% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -17.92% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -35.43% | +0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -2.96% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -3.48% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 3.55% | -1.75% |
Volatility
VYM vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.02%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 3.02% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 8.19% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 11.52% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 14.42% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 16.62% | -0.27% |
VYM vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and NOBL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYM has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to NOBL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.85% vs 9.89% for NOBL. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.
VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.35% for NOBL.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer