PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 11.85%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.


VYM

1D
1.17%
1M
1.98%
YTD
11.47%
6M
8.97%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
11.85%

NOBL

1D
0.75%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
12.41%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.85%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and NOBL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.92

The correlation between VYM and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VYM vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
NOBL

Financial Services

20.5%
12.4%

Technology

17.7%
3.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
9.7%

Industrials

12.1%
20.3%

Energy

9.8%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
5.1%

Utilities

5.7%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%
10.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
NOBL
12.4%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
NOBL
3.6%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
NOBL
9.7%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
NOBL
20.3%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
NOBL
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
NOBL
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
NOBL
5.1%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
NOBL
6.4%

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
NOBL

-

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
NOBL
10.9%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
NOBL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.37

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

3.50

+10.03

VYM vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYM vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-35.43%

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-9.11%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-15.36%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-17.92%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-35.43%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-2.96%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-3.48%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

3.55%

-1.75%

Volatility

VYM vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.02%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.02%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

8.19%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

11.52%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

14.42%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

16.62%

-0.27%

VYM vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYM vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.05%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.21%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and NOBL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to NOBL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.85% vs 9.89% for NOBL. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.

VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.35% for NOBL.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer