PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 7.47% return.


VYM

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.90%
YTD
10.18%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.92%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
11.63%

FDVV

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.03%
YTD
7.47%
6M
7.12%
1Y
21.30%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.18%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
7.47%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and FDVV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.92

The correlation between VYM and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VYM vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
FDVV

Financial Services

20.5%
17.0%

Technology

17.7%
29.1%

Healthcare

12.2%
3.1%

Industrials

12.1%
3.4%

Energy

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
13.6%

Utilities

5.7%
8.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Real Estate

0.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
FDVV
17.0%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
FDVV
29.1%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
FDVV
3.1%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
FDVV
3.4%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
FDVV

-

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
FDVV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
FDVV
13.6%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
FDVV
8.7%

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
FDVV
3.7%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
FDVV

-

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
FDVV
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.30

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

9.52

+3.29

VYM vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.13

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Drawdowns

VYM vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-40.25%

-16.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-9.30%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-15.90%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-20.18%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.96%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-3.80%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.24%

-0.45%

Volatility

VYM vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) have volatilities of 3.05% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.96%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

8.10%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

10.07%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

14.76%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

16.99%

-0.64%

VYM vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYM vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FDVV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.74%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.23%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and FDVV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.15% vs 11.15% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.23% for VYM.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.29% for FDVV.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer