PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.68%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


VYM

1D
0.51%
1M
2.08%
6M
9.09%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
9.40%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M
$204.09M$201.36M$203.61M

VYM vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.80%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and DGRO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.96

The correlation between VYM and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VYM vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
DGRO

Financial Services

21.0%
20.4%

Technology

17.8%
17.3%

Healthcare

13.2%
17.9%

Industrials

12.6%
11.3%

Energy

8.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.5%

Utilities

5.7%
7.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

VYM
21.0%
DGRO
20.4%

Technology

VYM
17.8%
DGRO
17.3%

Healthcare

VYM
13.2%
DGRO
17.9%

Industrials

VYM
12.6%
DGRO
11.3%

Energy

VYM
8.6%
DGRO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
DGRO
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.8%
DGRO
6.5%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
DGRO
7.3%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.3%
DGRO
2.5%

Communication Services

VYM
3.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VYM vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.83

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

14.91

-0.50

VYM vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYM vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-35.10%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.47%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-14.03%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-19.31%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-35.10%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.01%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-3.41%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.66%

+0.12%

Volatility

VYM vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.40%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

2.88%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

7.12%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

9.54%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

13.79%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

16.58%

-0.28%

VYM vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.23%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VYM and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to VYM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.38% vs 11.68% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer