UYG vs. NOBL
UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYG returned 18.50%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UYG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UYG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 9.31% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 18.50%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.
UYG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- -6.60%
- 6M
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- 1.43%
- 3Y*
- 30.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
UYG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | -6.60% | 19.77% | 55.71% | 22.14% | -32.11% | 76.26% | -20.32% | 66.15% | -22.61% | 39.28% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.31% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYG and NOBL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UYG and NOBL has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UYG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UYG
NOBL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UYG
NOBL
Technology
UYG
NOBL
Industrials
UYG
NOBL
Basic Materials
UYG
-
NOBL
Communication Services
UYG
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
UYG
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
UYG
-
NOBL
Energy
UYG
-
NOBL
Healthcare
UYG
-
NOBL
Real Estate
UYG
-
NOBL
Utilities
UYG
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UYG
NOBL
UYG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 1.68 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 4.26 | -4.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.90% | -35.43% | -62.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | -9.11% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.35% | -15.36% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -17.92% | -29.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.98% | -35.43% | -34.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.79% | -0.73% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -3.48% | -59.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 3.59% | +8.75% |
Volatility
UYG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.51%. This indicates that UYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYG | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 3.51% | +4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.38% | 8.32% | +14.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.93% | 11.50% | +17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 14.39% | +21.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.90% | 16.59% | +24.31% |
UYG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.50%, more than NOBL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | 12.50% | 11.72% | 0.51% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 9.39% | 0.66% | 0.90% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.76% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UYG has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to NOBL (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 18.50% vs 10.25% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYG.
UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.50%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.
UYG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYG and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer