PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYG vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 15.85%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


UYG

1D
-2.38%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-11.80%
1Y
-5.74%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
15.85%

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
-16.05%19.77%55.71%22.14%-32.11%76.26%-20.32%66.15%-22.61%39.28%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and NOBL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

0.82

The correlation between UYG and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UYG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYG
NOBL

Financial Services

98.0%
12.4%

Technology

1.7%
3.6%

Industrials

0.2%
20.3%

Basic Materials

-

10.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Energy

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Financial Services

UYG
98.0%
NOBL
12.4%

Technology

UYG
1.7%
NOBL
3.6%

Industrials

UYG
0.2%
NOBL
20.3%

Basic Materials

UYG

-

NOBL
10.9%

Communication Services

UYG

-

NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

UYG

-

NOBL
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

UYG

-

NOBL
23.5%

Energy

UYG

-

NOBL
3.4%

Healthcare

UYG

-

NOBL
9.7%

Real Estate

UYG

-

NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

UYG

-

NOBL
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG
UYG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYGNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.14

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.99

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.48

2.58

-3.06

UYG vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYGNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

0.80

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.35

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.57

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.64

-0.65

Drawdowns

UYG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYGNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.90%

-35.43%

-62.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-9.11%

-19.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-15.36%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.77%

-17.92%

-29.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-35.43%

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.72%

-5.99%

-14.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-3.48%

-59.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

3.50%

+8.38%

Volatility

UYG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that UYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYGNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

2.36%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

8.00%

+13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.84%

11.33%

+17.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.14%

14.38%

+21.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.04%

16.60%

+24.44%

UYG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
13.92%11.72%0.51%0.79%0.77%9.39%0.66%0.90%1.28%0.56%0.76%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYG has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 15.85% vs 9.51% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYG.

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

UYG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYG and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer