UYG vs. XLF
UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYG returned 18.56%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XLF. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UYG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
UYG vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 18.56%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.72% annualized return.
UYG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -7.63%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
XLF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
UYG vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | -5.36% | 19.77% | 55.71% | 22.14% | -32.11% | 76.26% | -20.32% | 66.15% | -22.61% | 39.28% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.77% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYG and XLF is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.98 |
The correlation between UYG and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
UYG vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UYG
XLF
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UYG
XLF
Technology
UYG
XLF
Industrials
UYG
XLF
Basic Materials
UYG
-
XLF
-
Communication Services
UYG
-
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
UYG
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
UYG
-
XLF
-
Energy
UYG
-
XLF
-
Healthcare
UYG
-
XLF
-
Real Estate
UYG
-
XLF
-
Utilities
UYG
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYG vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
UYG
XLF
UYG vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYG | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.10 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.52 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 1.33 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYG vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYG | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.90% | -82.69% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | -14.79% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.35% | -15.54% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -25.81% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.98% | -42.86% | -27.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -3.64% | -6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.22% | -19.99% | -43.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.27% | 5.79% | +6.48% |
Volatility
UYG vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.12%. This indicates that UYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYG | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 4.12% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 11.27% | +11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.20% | 14.62% | +14.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.14% | 18.58% | +17.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.95% | 22.11% | +18.84% |
UYG vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYG vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than XLF's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | 12.34% | 11.72% | 0.51% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 9.39% | 0.66% | 0.90% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.76% | 0.72% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.50% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, UYG and XLF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UYG has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to XLF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 18.56% vs 13.72% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYG.
UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.34%, compared with 1.50% for XLF.
UYG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 0.08% for XLF.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYG and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer