PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYG vs. FAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYG vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -24.46% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of 15.85%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.36% annualized return.


UYG

1D
-2.38%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-11.80%
1Y
-5.74%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
15.85%

FAS

1D
-3.47%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
-24.46%
6M
-18.86%
1Y
-12.36%
3Y*
34.13%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
18.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
-16.05%19.77%55.71%22.14%-32.11%76.26%-20.32%66.15%-22.61%39.28%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-24.46%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and FAS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.99

The correlation between UYG and FAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

UYG vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYG
FAS

Financial Services

98.0%
98.0%

Technology

1.7%
1.7%

Industrials

0.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UYG
98.0%
FAS
98.0%

Technology

UYG
1.7%
FAS
1.7%

Industrials

UYG
0.2%
FAS
0.2%

Basic Materials

UYG

-

FAS

-

Communication Services

UYG

-

FAS

-

Consumer Cyclical

UYG

-

FAS

-

Consumer Defensive

UYG

-

FAS

-

Energy

UYG

-

FAS

-

Healthcare

UYG

-

FAS

-

Real Estate

UYG

-

FAS

-

Utilities

UYG

-

FAS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYG vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG
UYG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYGFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

-0.29

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

-0.13

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.30

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

-0.71

+0.22

UYG vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYGFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

-0.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.30

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.19

-0.20

Drawdowns

UYG vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than FAS's maximum drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and FAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYGFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.90%

-91.61%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-40.88%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-43.10%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.77%

-66.88%

+19.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-85.99%

+16.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.72%

-30.69%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-31.11%

-32.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

17.51%

-5.63%

Volatility

UYG vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) is 6.51%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that UYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYGFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

9.50%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

32.51%

-10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.84%

42.76%

-13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.14%

55.49%

-19.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.04%

61.29%

-20.25%

UYG vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYG vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than FAS's 11.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
11.04%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
13.92%11.72%0.51%0.79%0.77%9.39%0.66%0.90%1.28%0.56%0.76%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, UYG and FAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAS has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to UYG (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs FAS's -91.61%.

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 18.36% vs 15.85% for UYG. On fees, UYG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 11.04% for FAS.

UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 1.00% for FAS.

UYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYG and FAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer