UYG vs. FAS
UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%) while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYG returned 18.56%/yr vs 22.50%/yr for FAS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UYG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
UYG vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of 18.56%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.50% annualized return.
UYG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -7.63%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
FAS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
UYG vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | -5.36% | 19.77% | 55.71% | 22.14% | -32.11% | 76.26% | -20.32% | 66.15% | -22.61% | 39.28% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -10.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYG and FAS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.99 |
The correlation between UYG and FAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
UYG vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UYG
FAS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UYG
FAS
Technology
UYG
FAS
Industrials
UYG
FAS
Basic Materials
UYG
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
UYG
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
UYG
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
UYG
-
FAS
-
Energy
UYG
-
FAS
-
Healthcare
UYG
-
FAS
-
Real Estate
UYG
-
FAS
-
Utilities
UYG
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYG vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
UYG
FAS
UYG vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYG | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.13 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 0.30 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYG vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than FAS's maximum drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYG | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.90% | -91.61% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | -40.88% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.35% | -43.10% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.77% | -66.88% | +19.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.98% | -85.99% | +16.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -17.88% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.22% | -31.10% | -32.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.27% | 18.17% | -5.90% |
Volatility
UYG vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) is 8.17%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that UYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYG | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 12.26% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 33.44% | -10.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.20% | 43.36% | -14.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.14% | 55.35% | -19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.95% | 61.18% | -20.23% |
UYG vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYG vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than FAS's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.32% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | 12.34% | 11.72% | 0.51% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 9.39% | 0.66% | 0.90% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.76% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, UYG and FAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FAS has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to UYG (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 22.50% vs 18.56% for UYG. On fees, UYG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 22.50% return vs 18.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.34%, compared with 9.32% for FAS.
UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYG and 1.00% for FAS.
UYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYG and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer