PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYG vs. ROM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYG vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -16.05% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 77.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 15.85%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 42.70% annualized return.


UYG

1D
-2.38%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-11.80%
1Y
-5.74%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
15.85%

ROM

1D
-2.01%
1M
45.36%
YTD
77.72%
6M
74.45%
1Y
152.07%
3Y*
59.24%
5Y*
31.70%
10Y*
42.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
-16.05%19.77%55.71%22.14%-32.11%76.26%-20.32%66.15%-22.61%39.28%
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
77.72%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and ROM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between UYG and ROM has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UYG vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYG
ROM

Financial Services

98.0%
3.0%

Technology

1.7%
55.2%

Industrials

0.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UYG
98.0%
ROM
3.0%

Technology

UYG
1.7%
ROM
55.2%

Industrials

UYG
0.2%
ROM
0.0%

Basic Materials

UYG

-

ROM

-

Communication Services

UYG

-

ROM

-

Consumer Cyclical

UYG

-

ROM

-

Consumer Defensive

UYG

-

ROM

-

Energy

UYG

-

ROM
0.1%

Healthcare

UYG

-

ROM

-

Real Estate

UYG

-

ROM

-

Utilities

UYG

-

ROM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYG vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG
UYG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYGROMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

3.66

-3.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

3.69

-3.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.48

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

4.73

-4.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

14.47

-14.96

UYG vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYGROMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

3.66

-3.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.62

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.86

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.54

-0.55

Drawdowns

UYG vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than ROM's maximum drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and ROM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYGROMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.90%

-83.36%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-32.33%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-48.10%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.77%

-67.55%

+19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-67.55%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.72%

-2.01%

-18.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-20.88%

-42.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

10.55%

+1.33%

Volatility

UYG vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) is 6.51%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that UYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYGROMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

14.00%

-7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

33.37%

-11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.84%

41.83%

-12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.14%

51.63%

-15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.04%

49.82%

-8.78%

UYG vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYG and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UYG vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than ROM's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.14%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
13.92%11.72%0.51%0.79%0.77%9.39%0.66%0.90%1.28%0.56%0.76%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYG and ROM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROM has higher volatility (14.00%) compared to UYG (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs ROM's -83.36%.

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.70% vs 15.85% for UYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.70% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYG and ROM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 0.14% for ROM.

UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%).

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYG and ROM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer