PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMDV vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 10.94% return.


TMDV

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.47%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*

IMCV

1D
0.89%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.94%
6M
12.09%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
5.35%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
10.94%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and IMCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.87

The correlation between TMDV and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMDV vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMDV
IMCV

Consumer Defensive

23.8%
8.9%

Financial Services

16.0%
15.6%

Industrials

15.9%
12.1%

Utilities

12.3%
10.0%

Basic Materials

11.7%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
8.7%

Healthcare

5.6%
8.5%

Real Estate

4.6%
5.6%

Energy

3.0%
12.5%

Technology

1.5%
9.1%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

TMDV
23.8%
IMCV
8.9%

Financial Services

TMDV
16.0%
IMCV
15.6%

Industrials

TMDV
15.9%
IMCV
12.1%

Utilities

TMDV
12.3%
IMCV
10.0%

Basic Materials

TMDV
11.7%
IMCV
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TMDV
5.8%
IMCV
8.7%

Healthcare

TMDV
5.6%
IMCV
8.5%

Real Estate

TMDV
4.6%
IMCV
5.6%

Energy

TMDV
3.0%
IMCV
12.5%

Technology

TMDV
1.5%
IMCV
9.1%

Communication Services

TMDV

-

IMCV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

3.68

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

13.75

-11.89

TMDV vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVIMCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.19

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.54

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-64.74%

+31.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-6.90%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-18.63%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-19.87%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

0.00%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-8.41%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

1.85%

+2.15%

Volatility

TMDV vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.62%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMDVIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.62%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

8.03%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

11.65%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

16.64%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

19.66%

-1.02%

TMDV vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMDV vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than IMCV's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.92%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.60%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMDV and IMCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMDV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to IMCV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDV dropped -33.42% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 5-year performance, IMCV leads with 8.88% vs 2.57% for TMDV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.92% for IMCV.

TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMDV and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer