TMDV vs. IMCV
TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMDV tracks the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index while IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMDV returned 2.57%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for IMCV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.
Performance
TMDV vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 10.94% return.
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCV
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
TMDV vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 5.35% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 10.94% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and IMCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TMDV and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMDV vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMDV
IMCV
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
TMDV
IMCV
Financial Services
TMDV
IMCV
Industrials
TMDV
IMCV
Utilities
TMDV
IMCV
Basic Materials
TMDV
IMCV
Consumer Cyclical
TMDV
IMCV
Healthcare
TMDV
IMCV
Real Estate
TMDV
IMCV
Energy
TMDV
IMCV
Technology
TMDV
IMCV
Communication Services
TMDV
-
IMCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDV vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank
TMDV
IMCV
TMDV vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDV | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.39 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.68 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 13.75 | -11.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDV | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.19 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.54 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and IMCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDV | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -64.74% | +31.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -6.90% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -18.63% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -19.87% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | 0.00% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -8.41% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 1.85% | +2.15% |
Volatility
TMDV vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 2.62%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDV | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.62% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 8.03% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 11.65% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 16.64% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 19.66% | -1.02% |
TMDV vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDV vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than IMCV's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.60% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMDV and IMCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMDV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to IMCV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDV dropped -33.42% vs IMCV's -64.74%.
On 5-year performance, IMCV leads with 8.88% vs 2.57% for TMDV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.
TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.92% for IMCV.
TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.06% for IMCV.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMDV and IMCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer