IMCV vs. IJH
IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.74%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for IJH. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
IMCV vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed IJH with an annualized return of 10.74%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.
IMCV
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
IMCV vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 10.42% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -10.93% | 12.60% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.82% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and IJH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IMCV and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCV vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCV
IJH
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
IMCV
IJH
Energy
IMCV
IJH
Industrials
IMCV
IJH
Technology
IMCV
IJH
Utilities
IMCV
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
IMCV
IJH
Consumer Defensive
IMCV
IJH
Healthcare
IMCV
IJH
Basic Materials
IMCV
IJH
Real Estate
IMCV
IJH
Communication Services
IMCV
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
IJH
IMCV vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMCV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.13 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 11.45 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than IJH's maximum drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -55.07% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -8.83% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.63% | -24.10% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -24.10% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | -42.18% | -4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.12% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -7.56% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.41% | -0.56% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.07%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.59% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 11.70% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 15.87% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 19.76% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 21.21% | -1.55% |
IMCV vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMCV vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than IJH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCV and IJH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJH has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to IMCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.74% vs 10.74% for IMCV. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCV.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.
IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.05% for IJH.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCV and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer