TMDV vs. REGL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL).
TMDV and REGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. REGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both TMDV and REGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMDV or REGL.
Key characteristics
| TMDV | REGL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.12% | 4.13% |
| 1Y Return | 4.11% | 13.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.29% | 3.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.28 | 0.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.15% | 14.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.42% | -36.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.16% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and REGL is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TMDV vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than REGL's 4.13% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMDV vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMDV vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMDV vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than REGL's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.45% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.22% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and REGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMDV vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 3.08%, while ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.