TMDV vs. UDI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI).

TMDV and UDI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. UDI is an actively managed fund by USCF Advisers. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022.

Performance

TMDV vs. UDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TMDV vs. UDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	3.86%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	2.45%
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund	5.95%	14.23%	17.07%	6.35%	3.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than UDI's 5.95% return.

TMDV

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: —

UDI

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. UDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UDI's 0.65% expense ratio.

UDI

USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund

TMDV

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF

Return for Risk

TMDV vs. UDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 22
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

UDI

UDI Risk / Return Rank: 69
UDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
UDI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
UDI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. UDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMDV	UDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	1.24	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	1.73	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.25	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	1.70	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	7.96	-6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMDV vs. UDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the UDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and UDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMDV	UDI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	1.24	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.88	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and UDI is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TMDV vs. UDI - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than UDI's 2.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.64%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund	2.53%	2.42%	5.33%	2.61%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. UDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than UDI's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and UDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMDV	UDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.42%	-14.17%	-19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-11.23%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.16%	-2.82%	-4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-3.16%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.45%	+1.17%

Volatility

TMDV vs. UDI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) at 3.17%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMDV	UDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	3.17%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	7.30%	+1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.88%	14.73%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	14.22%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	14.22%	+4.57%