PortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and QQQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

TMDV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
33.20%
152.76%
TMDV
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMDV:

0.22

QQQ:

0.63

Sortino Ratio

TMDV:

0.42

QQQ:

1.03

Omega Ratio

TMDV:

1.05

QQQ:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

TMDV:

0.21

QQQ:

0.70

Martin Ratio

TMDV:

0.62

QQQ:

2.32

Ulcer Index

TMDV:

5.36%

QQQ:

6.82%

Daily Std Dev

TMDV:

15.19%

QQQ:

25.22%

Max Drawdown

TMDV:

-33.42%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

TMDV:

-8.28%

QQQ:

-9.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -4.24% return.


TMDV

YTD

0.09%

1M

0.44%

6M

-2.39%

1Y

2.62%

5Y*

9.26%

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

-4.24%

1M

8.47%

6M

0.60%

1Y

12.94%

5Y*

18.64%

10Y*

17.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for TMDV: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMDV: 0.35%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMDV vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMDV is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMDV is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMDV is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMDV is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMDV is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMDV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for TMDV, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
TMDV: 0.22
QQQ: 0.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for TMDV, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
TMDV: 0.42
QQQ: 1.03
The chart of Omega ratio for TMDV, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
TMDV: 1.05
QQQ: 1.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for TMDV, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
TMDV: 0.21
QQQ: 0.70
The chart of Martin ratio for TMDV, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
TMDV: 0.62
QQQ: 2.32

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.22
0.63
TMDV
QQQ

Dividends

TMDV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than QQQ's 0.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.84%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.61%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.28%
-9.26%
TMDV
QQQ

Volatility

TMDV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 9.34%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 16.72%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.34%
16.72%
TMDV
QQQ