IMCV vs. IWS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from iShares - IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.97%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.

Performance

IMCV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 10.97%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.

IMCV

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 13.07%
• YTD: 17.00%
• 1Y: 27.75%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 10.97%
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

IWS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 14.40%
• YTD: 19.19%
• 1Y: 27.66%
• 3Y*: 15.33%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 10.30%
• ALL TIME*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	$2.44M	$2.33M	$2.03M
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	$90.38M	$82.14M	$73.71M

IMCV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	17.00%	13.52%	12.28%	11.89%	-6.98%	33.56%	-4.11%	24.72%	-10.93%	12.60%
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	19.19%	10.82%	12.91%	12.52%	-12.29%	28.10%	4.83%	26.73%	-12.43%	13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and IWS is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004	0.95

The correlation between IMCV and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCV	IWS
Financial Services	17.7%	16.3%
Industrials	11.6%	14.9%
Energy	11.4%	7.1%
Healthcare	10.3%	9.9%
Utilities	10.1%	7.2%
Technology	9.3%	13.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	8.5%
Real Estate	5.5%	8.7%
Basic Materials	4.8%	5.9%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.4%

Return for Risk

IMCV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV

IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 90
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

IWS

IWS Risk / Return Rank: 85
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCV	IWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.94	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.81	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	3.47	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.72	13.35	+1.37

IMCV vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, roughly equal to the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and IWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCV	IWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.74%	-62.40%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.90%	-7.53%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-20.57%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	-21.23%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.33%	-43.83%	-2.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.38%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-7.97%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.95%	-0.15%

Volatility

IMCV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 2.96%. This indicates that IMCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCV	IWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	2.96%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	9.98%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.59%	13.46%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	17.26%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.55%	19.30%	+0.25%

IMCV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMCV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than IWS's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.81%	2.23%	2.36%	2.30%	2.36%	1.86%	2.61%	2.45%	2.61%	1.87%	2.09%	2.29%
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.30%	1.53%	1.50%	1.76%	1.93%	1.39%	1.87%	1.97%	2.53%	1.96%	2.10%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCV and IWS in my portfolio?

IMCV and IWS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCV or IWS?

IMCV has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to IWS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs IWS's -62.40%.

Which ETF is better, IMCV or IWS?

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.97% vs 10.30% for IWS. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCV or IWS?

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCV or IWS?

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCV or IWS?

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.30% for IWS.

What is the main difference between IMCV and IWS?

IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.23% for IWS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.