IMCV vs. MDYV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV).
IMCV and MDYV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. MDYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. Both IMCV and MDYV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMCV or MDYV.
Key characteristics
| IMCV | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.91% | 4.18% |
| 1Y Return | 24.91% | 22.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.84% | 4.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.91% | 10.86% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.90% | 9.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.70 | 1.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.29% | 17.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -60.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and MDYV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IMCV vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than MDYV's 4.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 8.90% annualized return and MDYV not far ahead at 9.11%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCV vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMCV vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMCV vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than MDYV's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 2.08% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.87% |
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.24% | 4.05% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MDYV's maximum drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and MDYV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMCV vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.67%, while SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.