TMDV vs. AMAGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and AMAGX (Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares) are both funds - TMDV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while AMAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Amana. TMDV is passively managed, while AMAGX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMDV returned 3.77%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for AMAGX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AMAGX.

Performance

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's 14.81% return.

TMDV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 5.99%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: —

AMAGX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 34.39%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: 17.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	7.63%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	-5.10%	23.45%	4.82%	2.63%
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	14.81%	17.62%	15.73%	25.67%	-19.49%	31.51%	32.93%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and AMAGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between TMDV and AMAGX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TMDV vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 26
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

AMAGX

AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMDV	AMAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.00	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.74	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	3.07	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	13.16	-10.25

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and AMAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMDV	AMAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.42%	-57.64%	+24.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-11.04%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-21.45%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	-28.09%	+10.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-2.21%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-10.26%	+4.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	2.57%	+1.49%

Volatility

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 3.21%, while Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMDV	AMAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	6.35%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	13.88%	-5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	16.90%	-4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.41%	18.55%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.60%	18.50%	+0.10%

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	0.00%	0.00%	3.95%	0.65%	3.64%	0.52%	5.44%	3.15%	3.47%	10.90%	13.67%	7.45%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.55%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMDV and AMAGX in my portfolio?

TMDV and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMDV or AMAGX?

AMAGX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to TMDV (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDV dropped -33.42% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.