PortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. AMAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and AMAGX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMDV:

0.40

AMAGX:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

TMDV:

0.64

AMAGX:

0.37

Omega Ratio

TMDV:

1.08

AMAGX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

TMDV:

0.36

AMAGX:

0.15

Martin Ratio

TMDV:

1.03

AMAGX:

0.52

Ulcer Index

TMDV:

5.58%

AMAGX:

6.38%

Daily Std Dev

TMDV:

15.41%

AMAGX:

21.52%

Max Drawdown

TMDV:

-33.42%

AMAGX:

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

TMDV:

-7.08%

AMAGX:

-4.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's -0.67% return.


TMDV

YTD

1.40%

1M

2.47%

6M

-7.08%

1Y

4.10%

3Y*

2.58%

5Y*

8.08%

10Y*

N/A

AMAGX

YTD

-0.67%

1M

7.02%

6M

-2.16%

1Y

5.15%

3Y*

12.25%

5Y*

14.86%

10Y*

14.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMDV vs. AMAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMDV is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMDV is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAGX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and AMAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than AMAGX's 3.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.80%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
3.98%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%6.51%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and AMAGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TMDV vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 4.26%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...