IMCV vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.23%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than VOO's 1.34% yield.

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 5.92%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.