PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. SMMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 21.81% return.


IMCV

1D
0.32%
1M
1.06%
YTD
10.42%
6M
9.46%
1Y
23.40%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
10.74%

SMMD

1D
0.80%
1M
4.69%
YTD
21.81%
6M
18.80%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCV vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
10.42%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%10.00%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
21.81%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.58%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and SMMD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2017

0.84

The correlation between IMCV and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
SMMD

Financial Services

15.2%
12.8%

Energy

11.9%
4.4%

Industrials

11.8%
21.5%

Technology

10.3%
22.7%

Utilities

9.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
2.7%

Healthcare

8.7%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.0%

Real Estate

5.5%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
1.9%

Financial Services

IMCV
15.2%
SMMD
12.8%

Energy

IMCV
11.9%
SMMD
4.4%

Industrials

IMCV
11.8%
SMMD
21.5%

Technology

IMCV
10.3%
SMMD
22.7%

Utilities

IMCV
9.6%
SMMD
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
9.1%
SMMD
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
9.0%
SMMD
2.7%

Healthcare

IMCV
8.7%
SMMD
10.9%

Basic Materials

IMCV
6.4%
SMMD
4.0%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
SMMD
6.1%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.5%
SMMD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCV vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVSMMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

4.12

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

15.62

-2.97

IMCV vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and SMMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SMMD's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and SMMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVSMMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-41.06%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.66%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-25.50%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-28.26%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-8.33%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.54%

-0.69%

Volatility

IMCV vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.07%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVSMMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

5.75%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

13.30%

-5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

17.74%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

20.90%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

22.37%

-2.71%

IMCV vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than SMMD's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.92%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.05%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCV and SMMD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMD has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to IMCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs SMMD's -41.06%.

On 5-year performance, IMCV leads with 9.52% vs 8.24% for SMMD. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SMMD.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SMMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.15% for SMMD.

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and SMMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer