IMCV vs. SMMD
IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SMMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMCV returned 9.52%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for SMMD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.
Performance
IMCV vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 21.81% return.
IMCV
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
SMMD
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 21.81%
- 6M
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCV vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 10.42% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -10.93% | 10.00% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 21.81% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and SMMD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IMCV and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCV vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCV
SMMD
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
IMCV
SMMD
Energy
IMCV
SMMD
Industrials
IMCV
SMMD
Technology
IMCV
SMMD
Utilities
IMCV
SMMD
Consumer Cyclical
IMCV
SMMD
Consumer Defensive
IMCV
SMMD
Healthcare
IMCV
SMMD
Basic Materials
IMCV
SMMD
Real Estate
IMCV
SMMD
Communication Services
IMCV
SMMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
SMMD
IMCV vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMCV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 4.12 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 15.62 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SMMD's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and SMMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -41.06% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -9.66% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.63% | -25.50% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -28.26% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | 0.00% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -8.33% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.54% | -0.69% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.07%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 5.75% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 13.30% | -5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 17.74% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 20.90% | -4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 22.37% | -2.71% |
IMCV vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMCV vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than SMMD's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCV and SMMD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to IMCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs SMMD's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, IMCV leads with 9.52% vs 8.24% for SMMD. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SMMD.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.
IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SMMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.15% for SMMD.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCV and SMMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer