IMCV vs. VOE
IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index while VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCV returned 10.74%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for VOE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IMCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOE.
Performance
IMCV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 11.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.74% annualized return and VOE not far ahead at 10.94%.
IMCV
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
VOE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
IMCV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 10.42% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -10.93% | 12.60% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.61% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCV and VOE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IMCV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCV
VOE
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
IMCV
VOE
Energy
IMCV
VOE
Industrials
IMCV
VOE
Technology
IMCV
VOE
Utilities
IMCV
VOE
Consumer Cyclical
IMCV
VOE
Consumer Defensive
IMCV
VOE
Healthcare
IMCV
VOE
Basic Materials
IMCV
VOE
Real Estate
IMCV
VOE
Communication Services
IMCV
VOE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank
IMCV
VOE
IMCV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMCV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.50 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 13.22 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMCV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than VOE's maximum drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and VOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -61.50% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -6.93% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.63% | -18.45% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -19.70% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.33% | -43.18% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.18% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -8.33% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.83% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IMCV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.07%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.36% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 8.36% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 11.66% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 16.01% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 18.84% | +0.82% |
IMCV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMCV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison
IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than VOE's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IMCV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOE has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to IMCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs VOE's -61.50%.
On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.94% vs 10.74% for IMCV. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCV.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.86% for VOE.
IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.05% for VOE.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCV and VOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer