PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IMCV having a 17.00% return and VOE slightly lower at 16.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.97% annualized return and VOE not far behind at 10.86%.


IMCV

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.38%
6M
13.07%
YTD
17.00%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
9.92%

VOE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.29%
6M
11.88%
YTD
16.60%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.86%
ALL TIME*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.44M$2.33M$2.03M
$50.20M$55.46M$54.15M

IMCV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
17.00%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.60%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and VOE is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.95

The correlation between IMCV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
VOE

Financial Services

17.7%
18.7%

Industrials

11.6%
13.8%

Energy

11.4%
11.7%

Healthcare

10.3%
7.2%

Utilities

10.1%
12.6%

Technology

9.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.9%

Real Estate

5.5%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.5%

Financial Services

IMCV
17.7%
VOE
18.7%

Industrials

IMCV
11.6%
VOE
13.8%

Energy

IMCV
11.4%
VOE
11.7%

Healthcare

IMCV
10.3%
VOE
7.2%

Utilities

IMCV
10.1%
VOE
12.6%

Technology

IMCV
9.3%
VOE
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.6%
VOE
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.4%
VOE
5.9%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
VOE
5.8%

Basic Materials

IMCV
4.8%
VOE
6.7%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.4%
VOE
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.60

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

13.97

+0.75

IMCV vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than VOE's maximum drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-61.50%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-6.93%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-18.45%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-19.70%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-43.18%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.31%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-8.29%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.79%

+0.01%

Volatility

IMCV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.70%. This indicates that IMCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.70%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

8.10%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.36%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

15.89%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

18.73%

+0.82%

IMCV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, which matches VOE's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.81%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IMCV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCV has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VOE (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.97% vs 10.86% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV and VOE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.81%.

IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.05% for VOE.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer