TILL vs. CANE
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE).
TILL and CANE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TILL is an actively managed fund by Teucrium. It was launched on May 16, 2022. CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011.
Performance
TILL vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILL vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 8.82% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 3.95% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | -4.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's 3.95% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- -0.98%
- 3Y*
- -5.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- -20.03%
- 3Y*
- -4.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILL vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
CANE
TILL vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | -1.04 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | -1.49 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.66 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | -0.99 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | -1.04 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.25 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and CANE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TILL vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.56% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum CANE drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and CANE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -81.30% | +47.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -27.08% | +17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.97% | -61.46% | +34.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.15% | -56.43% | +35.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 19.30% | -12.97% |
Volatility
TILL vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 5.78%, while Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 7.65% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 14.35% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 19.31% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 20.97% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 21.79% | -7.15% |