TILL vs. CANE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. TILL is actively managed, while CANE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.48%/yr vs -9.83%/yr for CANE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for CANE.

Performance

TILL vs. CANE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's 0.56% return.

TILL

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 7.05%
• 6M: 11.60%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: -5.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 5.26%
• 6M: 2.62%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: -11.02%
• 3Y*: -9.83%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: -2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILL vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.26%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-5.00%	-11.52%
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.56%	-14.65%	-7.79%	30.06%	-3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and CANE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022	0.52

The correlation between TILL and CANE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TILL vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 17
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CANE

CANE Risk / Return Rank: 5
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TILL	CANE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.55	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	-0.68	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.92	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	-0.56	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	-0.85	+2.19

TILL vs. CANE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the CANE Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and CANE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TILL vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum CANE drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and CANE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILL	CANE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-81.30%	+47.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.87%	-19.82%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-41.73%	+12.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.01%	-62.71%	+36.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.59%	-56.54%	+34.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	12.98%	-8.48%

Volatility

TILL vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 4.31%, while Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILL	CANE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.40%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	16.00%	-5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	20.00%	-7.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	20.98%	-6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	21.59%	-6.86%

TILL vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILL vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.50%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILL and CANE in my portfolio?

TILL and CANE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILL or CANE?

CANE has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to TILL (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs CANE's -81.30%.

Which ETF is better, TILL or CANE?

On 3-year performance, TILL leads with -5.48% vs -9.83% for CANE. On fees, TILL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TILL or CANE?

Over the 3-year period, TILL has performed better with a -5.48% return vs -9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TILL or CANE?

TILL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for CANE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TILL or CANE?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.

What is the main difference between TILL and CANE?

TILL is categorized as Commodities, while CANE is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 1.88% for CANE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.