TILL vs. PDBA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and PDBA (Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while PDBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.51%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for PDBA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PDBA.

Performance

TILL vs. PDBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly higher than PDBA's 5.38% return.

TILL

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -6.04%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 0.28%
• 3Y*: -5.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PDBA

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILL vs. PDBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	6.30%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-5.00%	1.22%
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	5.38%	-0.76%	34.16%	7.83%	-1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and PDBA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022	0.56

The correlation between TILL and PDBA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TILL vs. PDBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 9
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PDBA

PDBA Risk / Return Rank: 13
PDBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. PDBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILL	PDBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	0.35	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	0.57	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.07	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	0.47	-0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	0.92	-0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILL vs. PDBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the PDBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and PDBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILL	PDBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	0.35	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.55	0.84	-1.39

Drawdowns

TILL vs. PDBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than PDBA's maximum drawdown of -12.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and PDBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILL	PDBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-12.45%	-21.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-8.05%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.40%	-12.45%	-17.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.66%	-6.47%	-22.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.39%	-3.79%	-17.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.39%	4.14%	+1.25%

Volatility

TILL vs. PDBA - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) at 4.05%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILL	PDBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	4.05%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	6.51%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	10.77%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	13.29%	+1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	13.29%	+1.44%

TILL vs. PDBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBA's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILL vs. PDBA - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PDBA's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.15%	3.32%	13.01%	6.82%	0.74%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.67%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILL and PDBA in my portfolio?

TILL and PDBA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILL or PDBA?

TILL has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to PDBA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs PDBA's -12.45%.

Which ETF is better, TILL or PDBA?

On 3-year performance, PDBA leads with 13.50% vs -5.51% for TILL. On fees, PDBA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PDBA has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TILL or PDBA?

Over the 3-year period, PDBA has performed better with a 13.50% return vs -5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TILL or PDBA?

PDBA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TILL or PDBA?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.15% for PDBA.

What is the main difference between TILL and PDBA?

TILL is categorized as Commodities, while PDBA is Agricultural Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.59% for PDBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.