TILL vs. USE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and USE (USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -6.08%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for USE. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for USE.

Performance

TILL vs. USE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than USE's 41.47% return.

TILL

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 3.21%
• 6M: 7.87%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: -6.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -7.05%

USE

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 26.04%
• 6M: 44.62%
• YTD: 41.47%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	$881.52K	$637.13K	$1.68M
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	$687.34K	$331.67K	$150.23K

TILL vs. USE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.16%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-3.01%
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	41.47%	-14.97%	22.58%	9.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and USE is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

TILL vs. USE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 21
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

USE

USE Risk / Return Rank: 19
USE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
USE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
USE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
USE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
USE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TILL vs. USE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TILL	USE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.37	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	0.78	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.09	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	0.45	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.54	0.85	+0.68

TILL vs. USE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the USE Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and USE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TILL vs. USE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than USE's maximum drawdown of -28.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and USE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILL	USE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-28.17%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.87%	-28.17%	+18.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.33%	-28.17%	+2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.41%	-9.08%	-18.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-8.39%	-13.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	14.94%	-11.14%

Volatility

TILL vs. USE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 5.26%, while USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) has a volatility of 15.11%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILL	USE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	15.11%	-9.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	30.99%	-19.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	34.85%	-21.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	28.54%	-13.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.76%	28.54%	-13.78%

TILL vs. USE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than USE's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILL vs. USE - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than USE's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.59%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	2.16%	3.06%	38.65%	4.83%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILL and USE in my portfolio?

TILL and USE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILL or USE?

USE has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to TILL (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs USE's -28.17%.

Which ETF is better, TILL or USE?

On 3-year performance, USE leads with 10.89% vs -6.08% for TILL. On fees, USE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TILL or USE?

Over the 3-year period, USE has performed better with a 10.89% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TILL or USE?

USE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TILL or USE?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.16% for USE.

What is the main difference between TILL and USE?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.79% for USE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.