CANE vs. WEAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT).
CANE and WEAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. WEAT is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. Both CANE and WEAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CANE or WEAT.
Key characteristics
| CANE | WEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.69% | -19.60% |
| 1Y Return | -16.55% | -15.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.81% | -15.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.55% | -2.11% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.10% | -8.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.68 | -0.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.87 | -0.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.28 | -0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.84 | -1.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 19.50% | 14.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.85% | 23.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.30% | -81.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -52.07% | -81.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and WEAT is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CANE vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than WEAT's -19.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has outperformed WEAT with an annualized return of -0.10%, while WEAT has yielded a comparatively lower -8.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CANE vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CANE vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CANE vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANE nor WEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CANE vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum WEAT drawdown of -81.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and WEAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CANE vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) at 4.96%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.