TILL vs. ZSB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and ZSB (USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while ZSB is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index. TILL is actively managed, while ZSB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -6.08%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for ZSB. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ZSB.

Performance

TILL vs. ZSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than ZSB's 2.41% return.

TILL

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 3.21%
• 6M: 7.87%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: -6.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -7.05%

ZSB

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: -5.21%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 1Y: 53.88%
• 3Y*: 1.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	$881.52K	$637.13K	$1.68M
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	$1.74K	$3.93K	$10.44K

TILL vs. ZSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.16%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-1.31%
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	2.41%	64.34%	-19.70%	-31.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and ZSB is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.10

Return for Risk

TILL vs. ZSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 21
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ZSB

ZSB Risk / Return Rank: 78
ZSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ZSB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ZSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ZSB Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TILL vs. ZSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TILL	ZSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.02	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	2.50	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.38	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	3.16	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.54	7.10	-5.57

TILL vs. ZSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ZSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and ZSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TILL vs. ZSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum ZSB drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and ZSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILL	ZSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-49.26%	+15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.87%	-16.75%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.33%	-37.91%	+12.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.41%	-13.65%	-13.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-30.05%	+8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	7.43%	-3.63%

Volatility

TILL vs. ZSB - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) at 3.57%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILL	ZSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	3.57%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	20.54%	-9.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	26.15%	-13.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	19.48%	-4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.76%	19.48%	-4.72%

TILL vs. ZSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSB's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILL vs. ZSB - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ZSB's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.59%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	0.90%	0.92%	2.96%	3.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILL and ZSB in my portfolio?

TILL and ZSB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILL or ZSB?

TILL has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to ZSB (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs ZSB's -49.26%.

Which ETF is better, TILL or ZSB?

On 3-year performance, ZSB leads with 1.20% vs -6.08% for TILL. On fees, ZSB is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ZSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TILL or ZSB?

Over the 3-year period, ZSB has performed better with a 1.20% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TILL or ZSB?

ZSB is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TILL or ZSB?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.90% for ZSB.

What is the main difference between TILL and ZSB?

TILL is categorized as Commodities, while ZSB is Lithium & Battery Metals. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.59% for ZSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.