CANE vs. FDEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX).
CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. FDEGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1990.
Performance
CANE vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CANE vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 7.02% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | -7.25% | 2.88% | 26.57% | 20.93% | -26.50% | 21.30% | 29.34% | 36.59% | -6.92% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than FDEGX's -7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has underperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 0.05%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
CANE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -14.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
FDEGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -18.20%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CANE vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
FDEGX
CANE vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | 0.13 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | 0.36 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.02 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.06 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 0.13 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.23 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.47 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.38 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and FDEGX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CANE vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANE nor FDEGX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.89% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 14.15% | 8.37% | 3.65% | 0.75% | 0.05% | 0.59% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and FDEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -85.96% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.86% | -20.45% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | -36.62% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -36.62% | -30.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.32% | -20.45% | -39.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -36.96% | -19.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.23% | 7.11% | +12.12% |
Volatility
CANE vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) have volatilities of 7.27% and 7.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 7.61% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 18.02% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 26.61% | -7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 23.11% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 21.85% | -0.06% |